Please note that tarot will pick up TRENDS /VIBRATIONS of PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE - it will pick up anything that is 'out there' whether it be true news or false news - either way it can throw light on what is 'in the air' - please bear this in mind when you are reading the insights.
It is very important that 'readers' of the blog understand this, therefore one has to be very discerning when reading. Media news can put out stories that are not factual or are pre -mediated but Tarot can pick that up. It does,nt mean that tarot is wrong, it shows tarot can see what might be suggested. However when writing the tarot it may be taken as fact.
3RD APRIL 2010 AMBER DUBOIS
Asking who is at the root of Ambers demise, the first thing I am doing is printing two cards - one because it shows the person and two because it shows how the person thinks.
What I seem to get right away is 'its not what it looks like - its not what you think' - therefore I assume that if someone has been thought of as possibly involved, it might not be that person -
What I see above is someone who is linked outside of the town in which Amber lives Im not sure in what way, whether they work there or go there - but the card is the card of the BANKER - so its wondering whether Amber took her Cheque out of the town or whether somehow the cheque is connected to the bank or person out of the town.
It seems to me that unless the cheque is already found the person has tried to 'bury it' or just 'forget about it' ? or is it worse then that ? did someone try to get the cheque off Amber by going to where she was 'placed' to get it off her believing it to still be on her person.
These are the kind of images that come to mind with the above pictorial tarot.
The four of pentacles is about Money, it is about coveting someone for money. Therefore the person that is the one linked to Ambers demise is someone who wished to retrieve something to do with money - One cannot really suggest its a BANKER - but a Banker and money does seem to suggest a CHEQUE.
Therefore it is someone who tried to get that cheque?
This card shows someone who wants to hang on to what he has and does seem to include the thoughts of money gift. So I have to leave that wide open.
I am not actually sure the person is married as often this card is for a Batchelor connected to a young lady. That is,nt set in stone but I leave it anyway.
There is also 'a loss of money' on this card - so it does seem to indicate one who wanted to get the money but had 'lost it'.
Therefore I connect Amber with someone who wanted that money which is all rather pointless really as being a cheque it cant lead to anything beyond according to this card.
So one wonders whether its a giver or receiver or a possessor.
The previous card is the 3 of pentacles which shows someone who worked harded towards something and wanted to do something really good . or that they worked hard for the money.
In this card is often a building it could show someone beforehand going towards this building with the money - but one cannot be entirely sure.
Going back to the 4 of Pentacles this is someone who would not take financial gambles lightly so they are not going to be frivalous with money they earn - therefore will not invest in something if they do not think it viable and if they have better thoughts for the money.
The only puzzling aspect is the woman I see here and the word 'financial security' - though it is not a good thing to suggest but one wonders if the money was going to be for a COUPLEs future security? or thoughts of that?
Either way it seems to me that this money was wanted by someone for their own personal security so maybe something came up where they needed it a short notice?
again I would rather leave it there.
Pentacles do describe people but we always have to be careful that they are not describing their physique but in fact their disposition or character.
However a Pentacles person are normally thought of as dark brown to mid brown haired people.
Pentacles can describe a practical person and they link to the AUTUMN months.
Someone got VERY GREEDY about this money.
One has to be careful with descriptive forms and also has to take into account that the reading could even be about Amber herself therefore some parts would be talking of her and not someone else. However there is clearly a money issue here and is likely part of the reason it has ultimately ended in Ambers demise.
"Monetary gain at the expense of others may lead to emotional bankruptcy, and inheritance often involves the loss of a loved one. Greed or shortsightedness may mean a loss of all gained - so take care not to lose sight of that which is truly important"
I am going to look for more clarification but someone hurt their leg. I see water and someone was in the water I dont know if they were trying to save someone else because I see a Branch being held out to them.